Comparison

Feroot vs Jscrambler vs Reflectiz for PCI DSS 6.4.3 & 11.6.1

Three quote-only tools built three different ways. Which one fits depends on whether you can add a tag, what else you need, and what evidence your assessor wants.

TL;DRFeroot vs Jscrambler vs Reflectiz

Jscrambler

Fits teams that also want JavaScript code protection for their own app.

Feroot

Fits teams whose scope includes privacy and healthcare tracking, many properties or native mobile checkouts.

Reflectiz

Fits teams that cannot add a tag: it scans remotely.

All three

Quote on request. None publishes a price.

Feroot vs Jscrambler vs Reflectiz: which fits PCI DSS 6.4.3 & 11.6.1?

Choose Jscrambler if you also want JavaScript code protection, Feroot if your scope includes privacy and healthcare tracking, many properties or native mobile checkouts, and Reflectiz if adding a tag to your payment pages is not possible, because it scans from outside. All three quote on request. If you want a published price and a free plan, Script Monitoring (ours) covers 6.4.3 & 11.6.1 with one tag, or with the Agentic Web Scanner where a tag is not possible.

Side by side

As of 7 November 2026, from each vendor's own website, in our words. We make a competing product, so read this as a vendor's comparison and check each point with the vendor.

FerootJscramblerReflectiz
How it deploysOne JavaScript tag, optionally a CSP header, plus a web crawlerAn agent added in your code or through a tag manager, plus agentless synthetic-user monitoringRemote scans in its own sandbox browser; nothing on your pages
Sees real customer sessionsYes, through the tagYes, through the agentNo, it sees what its scans see
Covers 6.4.3 & 11.6.1Yes, PaymentGuard (PCI DSS v4.0.1)Yes, Webpage IntegrityYes, its PCI module
PricingQuote after a demo; tiers by sites and payment pagesQuote on requestQuote on request
Free way to startA free one-page checkout scanA free trialThrough sales
Beyond PCIPrivacy and healthcare tracking, native mobile checkoutsJavaScript code protection and obfuscationWebsite exposure and privacy

Where each one is a poor fit

  • Feroot: if you want a published price or a small, PCI-only setup. Its tiers are built around many sites and payment pages.
  • Jscrambler: if you only need 6.4.3 & 11.6.1 and have no use for code protection, since you are buying into a broader platform.
  • Reflectiz: if your assessor wants evidence of what ran in real customers' browsers. A remote scan sees what a scan sees, which can differ from what a logged-in customer gets.

Questions to ask each vendor

  • Which of my payment pages do you watch, and in what share of real sessions?
  • Show me a sample export from a checkout like mine: inventory, justifications and alert history.
  • Do you catch a vendor's file changing at the same address?
  • What do you need on my page, and what happens to checkout if your service is down?
  • What will this cost at my traffic next year, in writing?

Compare them against your own checkout: Script Monitoring is free on 1,000 page views a month, no credit card.

Where Script Monitoring fits

Script Monitoring is one first-party tag that records every script in real customer sessions, keeps 6.4.3 & 11.6.1 as separate evidence records, and publishes its price: free on 1,000 page views a month, Pro from $99 a month. Where a tag is not possible, the Agentic Web Scanner (Pro) scans your pages on a schedule instead. It covers web pages, not native mobile apps. See the full comparisons with Feroot, Jscrambler and Reflectiz.

Sources and methodology

Every competitor fact is from that vendor's own website, read on 7 November 2026, and written in our own words: Feroot's product and pricing pages, Jscrambler's getting-started documentation, and Reflectiz's homepage, PCI module and plans pages. Products and prices change, so check them with the vendor.

Ask an AI

Don’t just take our word for it

Feroot vs Jscrambler vs Reflectiz: which fits PCI DSS 6.4.3 & 11.6.1?

Frequently asked questions

Feroot vs Reflectiz: which offers better PCI compliance automation?

They automate different things. Feroot works from a tag in real sessions plus a crawler, so its inventory reflects what customers' browsers ran. Reflectiz scans remotely, so it needs nothing on your pages but sees what its scans see. If your assessor wants real-session evidence, a tag-based tool fits better (as of 7 November 2026).

Feroot vs Jscrambler: which offers better mobile app protection?

Different kinds. Feroot says PaymentGuard covers native iOS and Android checkout flows for PCI. Jscrambler's strength is protecting your own JavaScript code, including in hybrid mobile apps (as of 7 November 2026). Script Monitoring covers web pages only.

Which of the three is cheapest?

None publishes a price, so you can only compare quotes. If a published price matters, Script Monitoring is free on 1,000 page views a month and Pro starts at $99 a month.

Can I try them for free?

Feroot offers a free one-page checkout scan and Jscrambler a free trial; Reflectiz starts through sales (as of 7 November 2026). Script Monitoring has a permanent free plan.

Do any of them need code changes on my site?

Feroot and Jscrambler add a tag or agent to your pages; Reflectiz adds nothing because it scans from outside. Script Monitoring is one tag, or the Agentic Web Scanner with nothing to install.

See every script on your own checkout.

Install the tag, mark your payment pages, and watch the inventory fill in. Free forever on 1,000 page views a month, no credit card.

Free forever plan. No credit card.